What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. https://dalsgaard-jarvis-2.thoughtlanes.net/how-far-can-you-get-from-the-5g-portable-tower-without-becoming-unsafe can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. what is a safe distance from a cell tower include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore, safe distance from cell tower and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.