Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System?
If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In safe distance to live from cell phone tower , psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.